A declined retail TPD claim is the start of the dispute pathway, not the end of the matter. Three avenues open in sequence: internal dispute resolution (IDR) with the insurer, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), then court action.
Each step has prescribed timeframes. Most disputes resolve before they reach a courtroom.
Step 1: Read the decline letter carefully
The decline letter must set out the reasons. The most common categories:
- The three-month qualifying absence was not satisfied.
- The medical evidence did not establish the 'unlikely ever again' permanence test.
- A pre-existing condition was not disclosed at application (a duty-of-disclosure breach).
- A specific exclusion on the policy schedule applied.
- The wrong definition was claimed (for example, an Any Occupation claim where Own Occupation cover was held outside super and the claimant had been unemployed for more than 12 months).
Each has a different response strategy. See why so many TPD claims are rejected for the common patterns.
Step 2: Internal Dispute Resolution (IDR)
Lodge a complaint in writing with the insurer's IDR team. ASIC Regulatory Guide 271 sets the binding standards.
The maximum timeframes for a final IDR response:
| Complaint category | Maximum response |
|---|---|
| Superannuation complaint (TPD held through super) | 45 calendar days |
| Non-superannuation complaint (TPD held outside super), most categories | 30 calendar days |
The response must:
- Acknowledge the complaint promptly.
- Be a single, written final IDR response.
- Set out the outcome, the reasons, and the evidence relied on.
- Set out the right to escalate to AFCA.
IDR is the appropriate point to submit new evidence: a supplementary specialist report responding to the IME findings, an updated functional capacity assessment, or evidence that the disclosed condition was in fact disclosed.
Step 3: Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA)
If the IDR outcome is unsatisfactory, the next step is AFCA. AFCA is the free external dispute resolution scheme covering financial services in Australia.
Key features:
- Free for consumers; the insurer pays AFCA's fees.
- AFCA jurisdiction covers life insurance (including TPD) up to a monetary limit. The Compensation Cap and Claim Amount thresholds are revised periodically; current limits are published on the AFCA website.
- AFCA decisions are binding on the insurer if the consumer accepts. They are not binding on the consumer, who retains the right to pursue court action.
- AFCA can require the insurer to pay the claim, reinstate the policy, or pay compensation for non-financial loss in specified categories.
How an AFCA dispute runs
- Lodge with AFCA online.
- AFCA requests a final IDR response if one has not been provided.
- AFCA assesses the complaint.
- AFCA attempts facilitation or conciliation.
- AFCA issues a determination if the matter does not resolve.
Step 4: Court action
Court action against the insurer remains available. It is now uncommon for life insurance disputes within AFCA's jurisdiction, and is typically reserved for:
- Claims above AFCA's monetary jurisdiction.
- Disputes where the consumer rejects an AFCA determination.
- Class-action claims where systemic conduct is alleged.
Many specialist plaintiff-side TPD law firms operate on a 'no-win, no-fee' costs arrangement. Costs are disclosed before any work begins. Engaging legal representation does not preclude lodging with AFCA in parallel.
Practical steps if a claim is declined
- Request the complete claim file in writing, including all medical reports, IME reports, file notes and the assessment summary. Insurers are required to provide this on request.
- Show the IME report to your treating specialists. Ask them to respond in writing to the specific findings.
- Lodge an IDR complaint within the 30-day or 45-day clock.
- If the IDR outcome does not address the substance of the new evidence, escalate to AFCA.
- Continue treatment and document any deterioration. A fresh claim is an option if the medical picture changes materially.
Related FAQs