Category: Exclusions
Retail TPD insurance carries a short list of standard PDS exclusions: intentional self-inflicted acts, anything specifically excluded on your policy schedule, and (in some PDS) criminal acts or war. The bigger risk to a claim is rarely a PDS exclusion. It is non-disclosure at application under the Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth).
The IMFL panel is AIA, Zurich, TAL, OnePath, ClearView, NEOS, Encompass, Acenda and Futura. The exclusion lists across the nine retail PDS are remarkably narrow compared with default super or direct cover.
The self-inflicted carve-out is consistent across the panel. Unlike the 13-month suicide exclusion on Life cover, the TPD self-inflicted exclusion has no time limit. The trigger is incapacity, not death.
No TPD benefit is paid where the disability arose from a deliberate self-inflicted act or attempted suicide. Each PDS uses substantially equivalent wording.
ClearView (PDS May 2024, page 25) and Encompass (PDS 26 September 2025) add a 14-day survival period for stand-alone TPD cover only. OnePath (PDS 1 October 2025) also excludes pre-existing disability (unless cover is reinstated) and personality or behavioural disorders linked to substance abuse.
The biggest source of real-world exclusions is not the PDS. It is the underwriting result.
After you disclose health and occupation history, the insurer can return one of four outcomes:
The PDS captures this through the 'anything specifically excluded on your plan schedule' wording. The endorsement applies for the life of the policy and is the practical reason most TPD claims that are denied are denied.
See how TPD insurance handles pre-existing conditions for how this gets agreed at application.
Under the Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth), as amended in 2013 for consumer insurance contracts, the applicant has a duty to take reasonable care not to make a misrepresentation. The duty sits in section 20B for consumer insurance contracts, and the older section 21 duty of disclosure applies to pre-2013 contracts.
Zurich describes the duty as 'a legal duty to take reasonable care not to make a misrepresentation to the insurer before the contract of insurance is entered into' (Zurich Wealth Protection PDS 1 November 2025).
If the duty is breached and the insurer would have offered different terms, remedies under the Act apply. Remedies include:
Even an unintentional omission, if material, can cost a claim. See why so many TPD claims are rejected for the in-practice patterns.
Exclusion breadth varies sharply by channel:
The distribution split sits in the retail vs direct life insurance guide.
The PDS for your specific cover lists every standard exclusion. The policy schedule lists any individual underwriting endorsements. Both documents must be read together to understand what is and is not covered.
Get indicative total and permanent disability (tpd) quotes from leading Australian insurers
More about total and permanent disability (tpd)